You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Oct 4, 2023. It is now read-only.
This is a highly desirable feature for LINZ (one of The Funders) and other Government agencies.
Ideally linz2osm would suck in data from the WFS vector layers of the LINZ Data Service (LDS, http://data.linz.govt.nz), and any other future WFS service, e.g. if the NZ Transport Agency launched WFS services in the future for their state highway data.
Each LINZ layer already configured in linz2osm should have a related WFS source in LDS.
Future value: In a couple of months, topo data from LDS will have unique identifiers and WFS changesets between data versions available.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
just wondering, what's the cleanest workflow method for LINZ data service WFS --> PostGIS?
aka is shp2pgsql lossy in that situation? is there a better middleman than .shp? :-/
csv + local parsing tool?
This is a highly desirable feature for LINZ (one of The Funders) and other Government agencies.
Ideally linz2osm would suck in data from the WFS vector layers of the LINZ Data Service (LDS, http://data.linz.govt.nz), and any other future WFS service, e.g. if the NZ Transport Agency launched WFS services in the future for their state highway data.
Each LINZ layer already configured in linz2osm should have a related WFS source in LDS.
Future value: In a couple of months, topo data from LDS will have unique identifiers and WFS changesets between data versions available.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: