Skip to content

"[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts \'\' into some log messages ingested from container logs #431" #431

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2020
Merged

"[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts \'\' into some log messages ingested from container logs #431" #431

merged 1 commit into from
Mar 31, 2020

Conversation

openshift-cherrypick-robot
Copy link

This is an automated cherry-pick of #430

/assign syedriko

@openshift-cherrypick-robot openshift-cherrypick-robot mentioned this pull request Mar 25, 2020
Merged
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1816770, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.5.0" instead
  • expected the bug to be in one of the following states: NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST, but it is ON_QA instead
  • expected Bugzilla bug 1816770 to depend on a bug targeting the "4.5.0" release and in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but no dependents were found

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

[release-4.4] Bug 1816770: Fluentd inserts '' into some log messages ingested from container logs

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. label Mar 25, 2020
@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/assign @jcantrill

@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 25, 2020
@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/retitle "[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts '' into some log messages ingested from container logs #431"

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot changed the title [release-4.4] Bug 1816770: Fluentd inserts \'\' into some log messages ingested from container logs "[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts \'\' into some log messages ingested from container logs #431" Mar 25, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1816836, which is invalid:

  • expected the bug to target the "4.4.0" release, but it targets "4.4.z" instead
  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1816770 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

"[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts '' into some log messages ingested from container logs #431"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@syedriko: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1816836, which is invalid:

  • expected dependent Bugzilla bug 1816770 to be in one of the following states: VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA), but it is ON_QA instead

Comment /bugzilla refresh to re-evaluate validity if changes to the Bugzilla bug are made, or edit the title of this pull request to link to a different bug.

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/bugzilla refresh

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. and removed bugzilla/invalid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is invalid for the branch this PR is targeting. labels Mar 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@syedriko: This pull request references Bugzilla bug 1816836, which is valid.

6 validation(s) were run on this bug
  • bug is open, matching expected state (open)
  • bug target release (4.4.0) matches configured target release for branch (4.4.0)
  • bug is in the state POST, which is one of the valid states (NEW, ASSIGNED, ON_DEV, POST, POST)
  • dependent bug Bugzilla bug 1816770 is in the state VERIFIED, which is one of the valid states (VERIFIED, RELEASE_PENDING, CLOSED (ERRATA))
  • dependent Bugzilla bug 1816770 targets the "4.5.0" release, matching the expected (4.5.0) release
  • bug has dependents

In response to this:

/bugzilla refresh

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/cherry-pick-approved

@bparees bparees added the cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. label Mar 27, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

5 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

14 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Mar 29, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/hold

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 30, 2020
@jcantrill
Copy link
Contributor

/hold cancel

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Mar 31, 2020
@syedriko
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 31, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: openshift-cherrypick-robot, syedriko

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 31, 2020
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit b6e0ff9 into openshift:release-4.4 Mar 31, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@openshift-cherrypick-robot: All pull requests linked via external trackers have merged: openshift/cluster-logging-operator#431. Bugzilla bug 1816836 has been moved to the MODIFIED state.

In response to this:

"[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts '' into some log messages ingested from container logs #431"

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

pmoogi-redhat pushed a commit to pmoogi-redhat/cluster-logging-operator that referenced this pull request Apr 26, 2022
@openshift-merge-robot
Merge pull request openshift#431 from openshift-cherrypick-robot/cher…
5aa2a4d 
…ry-pick-430-to-release-4.4

"[release-4.4] Bug 1816836: Fluentd inserts \'\' into some log messages ingested from container logs openshift#431"
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@igor-karpukhin igor-karpukhin Awaiting requested review from igor-karpukhin

@syedriko syedriko Awaiting requested review from syedriko

Assignees

@jcantrill jcantrill

@syedriko syedriko

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. bugzilla/valid-bug Indicates that a referenced Bugzilla bug is valid for the branch this PR is targeting. cherry-pick-approved Indicates a cherry-pick PR into a release branch has been approved by the release branch manager. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release/4.4
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
7 participants
@openshift-cherrypick-robot @openshift-ci-robot @syedriko @openshift-bot @jcantrill @bparees @openshift-merge-robot