Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: inject detach error #1523

Closed
wants to merge 2,533 commits into from

Conversation

jsafrane
Copy link

To test CSI migration

dims and others added 30 commits December 7, 2022 19:27
In 576cca0, we fixed one spot, looks
like we need to do the same for others!

Signed-off-by: Davanum Srinivas <davanum@gmail.com>
…for-multiple-components

add kms as to 1.26 rules for multiple components
The error result of `d.downloadAPIs()` is set in `aerr`,
not `err`.

This prevents a nil-ptr dereference of apiGroups in the next step.

Signed-off-by: Abhijit Hoskeri <abhijithoskeri@gmail.com>
…ck-of-#113933-upstream-release-1.26

[1.26.1] Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#113933: Limit request retrying to []byte request bodies
…ck-of-#114404-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#114404: Check the correct error in d.downloadAPIs
Change-Id: If99856aa6640375a8a9feff13fa213d4f974a99a
would cause a deadlock if an aggregated apiserver decided to respect ETags for its aggregated discovery document,
…-admission-defaults

OCPBUGS-4658: Apply shared defaulters to CRD-based routes.
…rry-pick-of-#114459-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#114459: fix double lock and excercise its codepath in tests
If the proxy doesn't respond to our CONNECT request with a 2XX status
code, we now display the proxy's response rather than the confusing
error "tls: first record does not look like a TLS handshake"
The username and password sent in the Proxy-Authorization header are not
supposed to be percent escaped prior to being base64 encoded.
The correct behavior is to stop upon the first Filter failure.
…rry-pick-of-#113776-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#113776: Creating Ingress IP loadbalancer alone when all the endpoints
…rry-pick-of-#113742-upstream-release-1.26

[1.26.1] Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#113742: Introducing LoadbalancerPortMapping flags for VipExternalIP
…rry-pick-of-#114407-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#114407: Windows Kube-Proxy implementation for internal traffic
…erry-pick-of-#114261-upstream-release-1.26

Automated cherry pick of kubernetes#114261: Reduce load of Job integration test
gnufied and others added 8 commits March 3, 2023 12:36
UPSTREAM: <carry>: update rebase doc
OCPBUGS-8092: Fix mounted volume expansion tests
…ugin

The CSIInlineVolumeSecurity admission plugin inspects inline CSI
volumes on pod creation and compares the
security.openshift.io/csi-ephemeral-volume-profile label on the
CSIDriver object to the pod security profile on the namespace.
OCPBUGS-8220: CSI Inline Volume admission plugin does not log object name correctly
OCPBUGS-10048: UPSTREAM: 115328: apiserver: annotate early (server not ready) and late (during shutdown) requests
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. label Mar 27, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 27, 2023

@jsafrane: No Bugzilla bug is referenced in the title of this pull request.
To reference a bug, add 'Bug XXX:' to the title of this pull request and request another bug refresh with /bugzilla refresh.

In response to this:

WIP: inject detach error

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Mar 27, 2023
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested review from deads2k and soltysh March 27, 2023 08:11
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 27, 2023

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: jsafrane
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign soltysh for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 28, 2023
@openshift-merge-robot
Copy link

PR needs rebase.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 28, 2023

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 28, 2023

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Mar 28, 2023

@jsafrane: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits are valid:

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files label Mar 28, 2023
@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Mar 28, 2023

@jsafrane: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/verify 54b5520 link true /test verify
ci/prow/e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade 54b5520 link true /test e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-conformance-aws 54b5520 link true /test k8s-e2e-conformance-aws
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-serial 54b5520 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-fips 54b5520 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-fips
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-downgrade 54b5520 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-downgrade
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade 54b5520 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 54b5520 link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd
ci/prow/images 54b5520 link true /test images
ci/prow/integration 54b5520 link true /test integration
ci/prow/verify-commits 54b5520 link true /test verify-commits
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2 54b5520 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-cgroupsv2
ci/prow/e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade 54b5520 link true /test e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-aws-ovn-serial 54b5520 link false /test k8s-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-crun 54b5520 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-crun
ci/prow/artifacts 54b5520 link true /test artifacts
ci/prow/k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn 54b5520 link true /test k8s-e2e-gcp-ovn
ci/prow/e2e-aws-csi 54b5520 link false /test e2e-aws-csi
ci/prow/unit 54b5520 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-serial 54b5520 link true /test e2e-aws-ovn-serial
ci/prow/e2e-gcp 54b5520 link true /test e2e-gcp

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@jsafrane
Copy link
Author

jsafrane commented Apr 4, 2023

/reopen

@openshift-ci
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 4, 2023

@jsafrane: Failed to re-open PR: state cannot be changed. The detach-migration-error branch was force-pushed or recreated.

In response to this:

/reopen

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet