Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

OCPNODE-1892: Rebase k8s 1.29.0-rc.1 #1810

Closed
wants to merge 2,270 commits into from

Conversation

sairameshv
Copy link
Member

@sairameshv sairameshv commented Nov 23, 2023

cc: @soltysh

k8s-ci-robot and others added 30 commits November 1, 2023 17:47
…-check-fix

golangci-lint: tone down comment checking
Signed-off-by: bzsuni <bingzhe.sun@daocloud.io>
…ailure

increase bounded limits for major page faults
Make service-cidrs-controller role feature-gated
Signed-off-by: James Sturtevant <jstur@microsoft.com>
update docs for v1.29 release (note this must be committed after code freeze)
wait.PollUntilContextCancel immediately executes condition once
Add a test that checks if the CRB (kubeadm:cluster-admins)
used for binding admin.conf file users (part of the
kubeadm:cluster-admins Group) to the "cluster-admins"
ClusterRole exists in kubeadm clusters.

It does that only for versions newer than the version
when this feature was added.
…dex-load-test

Benchmark job with backoff limit per index
…conf

test/e2e_kubeadm: add test for the kubeadm:cluster-admins CRB
Add conformance tests for flowcontrol APIs
…dex-remaining-e2e-test

Add remaining e2e tests for Job BackoffLimitPerIndex based on KEP
Add Azure to the list of providers that support accessing nodes
using SSH.
Note: This will require a follow up PR adding the required
environment variables, AZURE_SSH_KEY, KUBE_SSH_BASTION to the test
configuration.
CEL

Signed-off-by: Anish Ramasekar <anish.ramasekar@gmail.com>
…k-test

Add multi-webhook integration test
…r_info_fix

[StructuredAuthn] Ensure empty fields of user object are accessible by CEL
Signed-off-by: kerthcet <kerthcet@gmail.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 6, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

3 similar comments
@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Updated the Disabled featurelist with only alpha features of kube

Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <svanka@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 6, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <svanka@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <svanka@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 6, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

1 similar comment
@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 7, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 7, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

@sairameshv
Copy link
Member Author

/payload 4.15 ci blocking
/payload 4.15 nightly blocking

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 7, 2023

@sairameshv: trigger 5 job(s) of type blocking for the ci release of OCP 4.15

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-e2e-azure-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-e2e-gcp-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-e2e-aws-sdn-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.15-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a2289440-94f9-11ee-879d-1e5028086403-0

trigger 9 job(s) of type blocking for the nightly release of OCP 4.15

  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.15-e2e-aws-sdn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-e2e-azure-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-upgrade-from-stable-4.14-e2e-gcp-ovn-rt-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-hypershift-release-4.15-periodics-e2e-aws-ovn-conformance
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.15-e2e-aws-ovn-serial
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-ci-4.15-e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.15-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-dualstack
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.15-e2e-metal-ipi-ovn-ipv6
  • periodic-ci-openshift-release-master-nightly-4.15-e2e-metal-ipi-sdn-bm

See details on https://pr-payload-tests.ci.openshift.org/runs/ci/a2289440-94f9-11ee-879d-1e5028086403-1

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

Signed-off-by: Sai Ramesh Vanka <svanka@redhat.com>
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Dec 11, 2023

@sairameshv: the contents of this pull request could not be automatically validated.

The following commits could not be validated and must be approved by a top-level approver:

Comment /validate-backports to re-evaluate validity of the upstream PRs, for example when they are merged upstream.

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 11, 2023

@sairameshv: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/integration 20849f0 link true /test integration
ci/prow/unit 20849f0 link true /test unit
ci/prow/e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd 20849f0 link false /test e2e-agnostic-ovn-cmd

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@soltysh
Copy link
Member

soltysh commented Dec 15, 2023

/close
replaced by #1815

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot closed this Dec 15, 2023
Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Dec 15, 2023

@soltysh: Closed this PR.

In response to this:

/close
replaced by #1815

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
backports/unvalidated-commits Indicates that not all commits come to merged upstream PRs. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. vendor-update Touching vendor dir or related files
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet