-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 226
Revert "OCPCLOUD-2980: add ingress/egress network policy" #1395
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Revert "OCPCLOUD-2980: add ingress/egress network policy" #1395
Conversation
@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2980 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
/assign @JoelSpeed @huali9 |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
cc. @elfosardo |
@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2980 which is a valid jira issue. Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set. In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository. |
Sorry about this, thank you @damdo |
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview |
@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-host-groups-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-operator, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-vcenter, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn, ci/prow/goimports, ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/verify-crds-sync In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/lgtm Based on slack discussion and @huali9 comment above. |
/skip |
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade |
@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade In response to this:
Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
/label approved |
257c594
into
openshift:main
[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER] Distgit: ose-machine-api-operator |
Reverts #1387
Context of the revert: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1753432709848339