Skip to content

Conversation

damdo
Copy link
Member

@damdo damdo commented Jul 25, 2025

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Jul 25, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2980 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Reverts #1387

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Jul 25, 2025

/assign @JoelSpeed @huali9

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from nrb July 25, 2025 09:09
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by:
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign theobarberbany for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot requested a review from RadekManak July 25, 2025 09:09
@damdo
Copy link
Member Author

damdo commented Jul 25, 2025

cc. @elfosardo

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci-robot commented Jul 25, 2025

@damdo: This pull request references OCPCLOUD-2980 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.20.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

Reverts #1387

Context of the revert: https://redhat-internal.slack.com/archives/C01CQA76KMX/p1753432709848339

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@huali9
Copy link
Contributor

huali9 commented Jul 25, 2025

Sorry about this, thank you @damdo

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn
/override ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-vcenter
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
/override ci/prow/goimports
/override ci/prow/verify-crds-sync
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-operator
/override ci/prow/security
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-host-groups-ovn

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator, ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-host-groups-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-operator, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-vcenter, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upgrade, ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn, ci/prow/goimports, ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn, ci/prow/security, ci/prow/verify-crds-sync

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn
/override ci/prow/okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-multi-vcenter
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-static-ovn
/override ci/prow/goimports
/override ci/prow/verify-crds-sync
/override ci/prow/e2e-metal-ipi-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-operator
/override ci/prow/security
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-techpreview-serial
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-ovn-upgrade
/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-operator
/override ci/prow/e2e-vsphere-host-groups-ovn

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

Based on slack discussion and @huali9 comment above.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 25, 2025
@neisw
Copy link

neisw commented Jul 25, 2025

/skip

@dgoodwin
Copy link
Contributor

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jul 25, 2025

@dgoodwin: Overrode contexts on behalf of dgoodwin: ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

In response to this:

/override ci/prow/e2e-aws-ovn-upgrade

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@neisw
Copy link

neisw commented Jul 25, 2025

/label approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Jul 25, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 257c594 into openshift:main Jul 25, 2025
33 of 35 checks passed
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

[ART PR BUILD NOTIFIER]

Distgit: ose-machine-api-operator
This PR has been included in build ose-machine-api-operator-container-v4.20.0-202507251914.p0.g257c594.assembly.stream.el9.
All builds following this will include this PR.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants