Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Add a readme #199

Merged
merged 1 commit into from Oct 13, 2021
Merged

Add a readme #199

merged 1 commit into from Oct 13, 2021

Conversation

kevinrizza
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Oct 12, 2021
@timflannagan
Copy link
Contributor

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Oct 12, 2021
dinhxuanvu
dinhxuanvu approved these changes Oct 12, 2021
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Oct 12, 2021

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: dinhxuanvu, kevinrizza

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
  • OWNERS [dinhxuanvu,kevinrizza]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

16 similar comments
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest-required

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 001135e into openshift:master Oct 13, 2021
anik120 pushed a commit to anik120/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2021
@camilamacedo86 @anik120
deprecate: CommunityValidator (openshift#199)
766f1e7 
The community validator were deprecated.
This checks were moved to the external validator:
OCP OLM Catalog Validator

More info: https://github.com/redhat-openshift-ecosystem/ocp-olm-catalog-validator

upstream-repository: api
upstream-commit: eceda8b99fe0ad9e8b3ca91ee287c75f52fc898f
anik120 pushed a commit to anik120/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Dec 10, 2021
@camilamacedo86 @anik120
deprecate: CommunityValidator (openshift#199)
6d609e9 
The community validator were deprecated.
This checks were moved to the external validator:
OCP OLM Catalog Validator

More info: https://github.com/redhat-openshift-ecosystem/ocp-olm-catalog-validator

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: eceda8b99fe0ad9e8b3ca91ee287c75f52fc898f
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@camilamacedo86 @perdasilva
deprecate: CommunityValidator (openshift#199)
eabb399 
The community validator were deprecated.
This checks were moved to the external validator:
OCP OLM Catalog Validator

More info: https://github.com/redhat-openshift-ecosystem/ocp-olm-catalog-validator

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: eceda8b99fe0ad9e8b3ca91ee287c75f52fc898f
perdasilva pushed a commit to perdasilva/operator-framework-olm that referenced this pull request Mar 4, 2022
@camilamacedo86 @perdasilva
deprecate: CommunityValidator (openshift#199)
4a3523e 
The community validator were deprecated.
This checks were moved to the external validator:
OCP OLM Catalog Validator

More info: https://github.com/redhat-openshift-ecosystem/ocp-olm-catalog-validator

Upstream-repository: api
Upstream-commit: eceda8b99fe0ad9e8b3ca91ee287c75f52fc898f
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu approved these changes

@joelanford joelanford Awaiting requested review from joelanford

Assignees

@dinhxuanvu dinhxuanvu

@timflannagan timflannagan

Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet
5 participants
@kevinrizza @timflannagan @openshift-bot @dinhxuanvu @openshift-merge-robot