Skip to content

Conversation

tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

@tmshort tmshort commented Sep 23, 2025

The method used to copy the helm charts is including an extra helm directory in the destination path, that is making the cluster-olm-operator code just a bit more complicated than it needs to be.

This fixes the copy location.

The method used to copy the helm charts is including an extra `helm`
directory in the destination path, that is making the cluster-olm-operator
code just a bit more complicated than it needs to be.

This fixes the copy location.

Signed-off-by: Todd Short <todd.short@me.com>
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. label Sep 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 23, 2025

@tmshort: This pull request references OPRUN-4160 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

The method used to copy the helm charts is including an extra helm directory in the destination path, that is making the cluster-olm-operator code just a bit more complicated than it needs to be.

This fixes the copy location.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 23, 2025
@bandrade
Copy link

/verified by @bandrade
/label qe-approved

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR label Sep 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

openshift-ci-robot commented Sep 23, 2025

@tmshort: This pull request references OPRUN-4160 which is a valid jira issue.

Warning: The referenced jira issue has an invalid target version for the target branch this PR targets: expected the story to target the "4.21.0" version, but no target version was set.

In response to this:

The method used to copy the helm charts is including an extra helm directory in the destination path, that is making the cluster-olm-operator code just a bit more complicated than it needs to be.

This fixes the copy location.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria label Sep 23, 2025
@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

@bandrade: This PR has been marked as verified by @bandrade.

In response to this:

/verified by @bandrade
/label qe-approved

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the openshift-eng/jira-lifecycle-plugin repository.

Copy link
Contributor

@anik120 anik120 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I didn't get a sense of how exactly the cluster-olm-operator code is getting complicated and how this fix alleviates that problem from the PR itself, but the change does what the PR's intention is (ie copy contents of the helm directory into catalogd, instead of copying the helm directory itself). so

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 23, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 23, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: anik120, tmshort

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 23, 2025

I didn't get a sense of how exactly the cluster-olm-operator code is getting complicated and how this fix alleviates that problem from the PR itself, but the change does what the PR's intention is (ie copy contents of the helm directory into catalogd, instead of copying the helm directory itself). so

Yeah, it's the extra directory, and it's a WIP PR, so you probably haven't noticed it yet.

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 23, 2025

(This has no impact on the current cluster-olm-operator, just the one I'm working on.)

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 23, 2025

This got all the way to deprovision and then failed...
/test e2e-aws-techpreview-olmv1-ext

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 83ffc35 and 2 for PR HEAD 1490f76 in total

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 24, 2025

/retest-required

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 24, 2025

/test openshift-e2e-aws-techpreview
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 24, 2025

/retest-required

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 24, 2025

/test openshift-e2e-aws-techpreview

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 24, 2025

/test openshift-e2e-aws
/test okd-scos-e2e-aws-ovn
/test openshift-e2e-aws-techpreview

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

@openshift-ci-robot
Copy link

/retest-required

Remaining retests: 0 against base HEAD 1487ceb and 1 for PR HEAD 1490f76 in total

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 25, 2025

/retest-required

@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 25, 2025

/hold
Wait for next sync to occur

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 25, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 26, 2025

/unhold

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Sep 26, 2025
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor Author

tmshort commented Sep 26, 2025

/retest-required

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 26, 2025

@tmshort: The following test failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
ci/prow/openshift-e2e-aws-techpreview 1490f76 link false /test openshift-e2e-aws-techpreview

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 77ab3fd into openshift:main Sep 26, 2025
11 of 12 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. jira/valid-reference Indicates that this PR references a valid Jira ticket of any type. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. qe-approved Signifies that QE has signed off on this PR verified Signifies that the PR passed pre-merge verification criteria
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants