Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move component to an appropriate upgrade order (generic) #52

Merged

Conversation

smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor

Now that CVO only applies ordering on update, we are reorganizing
the order components are applied to better align with correct
upgrades. The order is:

0000_10_: config-operator
0000_20_
: kube-apiserver
0000_25_: kube scheduler and controller manager
0000_30_
: other apiservers: openshift and machine
0000_40_: reserved
0000_50_
: all non-order specific components
0000_60_: reserved
0000_70_
: disruptive node-level components: dns, sdn, multus
0000_80_: machine operators
0000_90_
: reserved for any post-machine updates

Operators in 0000_50_* should have no prefix (like 0000_70_
before). No other rules of ordering have changed.

Now that CVO only applies ordering on update, we are reorganizing
the order components are applied to better align with correct
upgrades. The order is:

0000_10_*: config-operator
0000_20_*: kube-apiserver
0000_25_*: kube scheduler and controller manager
0000_30_*: other apiservers: openshift and machine
0000_40_*: reserved
0000_50_*: all non-order specific components
0000_60_*: reserved
0000_70_*: disruptive node-level components: dns, sdn, multus
0000_80_*: machine operators
0000_90_*: reserved for any post-machine updates

Operators in 0000_50_* should have no prefix (like 0000_70_
before). No other rules of ordering have changed.
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Apr 27, 2019
@enj
Copy link
Contributor

enj commented Apr 29, 2019

/lgtm

@smarterclayton
Copy link
Contributor Author

/retest

@smarterclayton smarterclayton added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 29, 2019
@openshift-bot
Copy link
Contributor

/retest

Please review the full test history for this PR and help us cut down flakes.

@openshift-merge-robot openshift-merge-robot merged commit 74ca960 into openshift:master Apr 29, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants