-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 78
chore(deps): Bump to kube 1.17 #22
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Large diffs are not rendered by default.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
This file was deleted.
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
should we use
replace
to pin the version? also, since we are following origin, should we use exactly the version they are using? Thanks.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@Bowenislandsong thanks for reviewing the PR!
I see that origin is using 1.17.1, thanks for pointing that out. But could you help me understand why we'd wanna keep pace with origin? I don't see any dependency between api and origin.
Also, I don't get the need to use
replace
in this case.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Aligning with origin will help when we need to pull api in olm, which also depends on origin for ClusterOperator apis.
(that said I think this patch version will be fine - I'm not sure that it's a big deal to differ in patch versions as long as we're prepared to resolve any inconsistencies if we hit them)
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@ecordell thanks for clarifying that. Is that a lgtm or a let's change the patch version anyway though? 😄 I don't mind changing it if we anticipate that we'll have to resolve inconsistencies.