Skip to content

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Description

Reviewer Checklist

  • API Go Documentation
  • Tests: Unit Tests (and E2E Tests, if appropriate)
  • Comprehensive Commit Messages
  • Links to related GitHub Issue(s)

@joelanford joelanford requested a review from a team as a code owner September 9, 2025 01:18
Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 2e16ac7
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/olmv1/deploys/68c48d46b4db0e0008283efa
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2201--olmv1.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Sep 9, 2025

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 72.17%. Comparing base (c73b6e0) to head (2e16ac7).
⚠️ Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #2201      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   71.95%   72.17%   +0.22%     
==========================================
  Files          85       85              
  Lines        8436     8407      -29     
==========================================
- Hits         6070     6068       -2     
+ Misses       1959     1939      -20     
+ Partials      407      400       -7     
Flag Coverage Δ
e2e 39.16% <70.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
experimental-e2e 46.19% <90.00%> (+0.16%) ⬆️
unit 57.01% <70.00%> (+0.01%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.

encoder := json.NewEncoder(hasher)
if err := encoder.Encode(obj); err != nil {
return "", fmt.Errorf("couldn't encode object: %w", err)
panic(fmt.Sprintf("couldn't encode object: %v", err))
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why do we want this to panic? Seems a bit excessive?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@thetechnick
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

},
}
defaultDesiredHash := "705ada5296ab26f74d94bfa497295a0cbccdb140623bbe704a3506cd1dfba4eb"
defaultDesiredHash := "gvvp8nzq5sbila80hkiv69am8hdr7o68qkk8n084gdn"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

could the change in hash cause problems with existing installed content after upgrade?

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I guess if the upgrade CI job passed, we're good...?

@perdasilva
Copy link
Contributor

/approve

Copy link

openshift-ci bot commented Sep 12, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva, thetechnick

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 12, 2025
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
@tmshort tmshort force-pushed the fix-deep-hash-object branch from 0216a7a to 2e16ac7 Compare September 12, 2025 21:14
@tmshort
Copy link
Contributor

tmshort commented Sep 12, 2025

I rebased this to deal with go.mod/go.sum changes.
/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 12, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 4867f92 into operator-framework:main Sep 12, 2025
25 checks passed
@joelanford joelanford deleted the fix-deep-hash-object branch September 16, 2025 17:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants