-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
🌱 promote rukpak hash util to shared package, use in boxcutter applier #2201
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
🌱 promote rukpak hash util to shared package, use in boxcutter applier #2201
Conversation
✅ Deploy Preview for olmv1 ready!
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration. |
Codecov Report✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests. Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2201 +/- ##
==========================================
+ Coverage 71.95% 72.17% +0.22%
==========================================
Files 85 85
Lines 8436 8407 -29
==========================================
- Hits 6070 6068 -2
+ Misses 1959 1939 -20
+ Partials 407 400 -7
Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. 🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
|
encoder := json.NewEncoder(hasher) | ||
if err := encoder.Encode(obj); err != nil { | ||
return "", fmt.Errorf("couldn't encode object: %w", err) | ||
panic(fmt.Sprintf("couldn't encode object: %v", err)) |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why do we want this to panic? Seems a bit excessive?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/approve |
66293ac
to
0216a7a
Compare
}, | ||
} | ||
defaultDesiredHash := "705ada5296ab26f74d94bfa497295a0cbccdb140623bbe704a3506cd1dfba4eb" | ||
defaultDesiredHash := "gvvp8nzq5sbila80hkiv69am8hdr7o68qkk8n084gdn" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
could the change in hash cause problems with existing installed content after upgrade?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I guess if the upgrade CI job passed, we're good...?
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: perdasilva, thetechnick The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Signed-off-by: Joe Lanford <joe.lanford@gmail.com>
0216a7a
to
2e16ac7
Compare
I rebased this to deal with go.mod/go.sum changes. |
4867f92
into
operator-framework:main
Description
Reviewer Checklist