Skip to content

Conversation

camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 commented Jul 25, 2020

Description of the change:
Follow-up of #3533

Motivation for the change:

Blocked by : #3433

Copy link
Member

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is effectively doing the same thing as #3533, although no tests should be removed (ansible-molecule) to make this pass. #3433 should be merged first.

@camilamacedo86

This comment has been minimized.

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title removal: support to the legacy projects WIP: removal: support to the legacy projects Jul 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 27, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title WIP: removal: support to the legacy projects removal: support to the legacy projects Jul 27, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/work-in-progress Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is a work in progress. label Jul 27, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 added blocked kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. labels Jul 27, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

I flagged as blocked this one in favor of #3533 eric's pr's.
However, I will not close this one because it shows as points not done in #3533. The idea here is:

c/c @estroz

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 28, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 30, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 requested a review from estroz July 30, 2020 12:47
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 changed the title removal: support to the legacy projects removal: cleanup over legacy support Jul 30, 2020
@camilamacedo86
Copy link
Contributor Author

@joelanford rebased with the master.

Copy link
Member

@joelanford joelanford left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jul 30, 2020
Copy link
Member

@estroz estroz left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 merged commit 6bcaff8 into operator-framework:master Jul 30, 2020
@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 deleted the remove-legacy branch July 30, 2020 17:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants