Skip to content

Conversation

joelanford
Copy link
Member

Description of the change:
Backport all outstanding bugfixes on the master branch

Motivation for the change:
Good to have bugs fixed!

Checklist

If the pull request includes user-facing changes, extra documentation is required:

JAORMX and others added 9 commits September 17, 2020 08:48
…#3795)

* Make bundle validate subcommand respect verbosity

This makes the bundle validate subcommand respect the verbosity level
by setting it directly in the logger that's actually used, and not in
the global logger as was done previously.

Closes: operator-framework#3793

* add unit test 

Co-authored-by: Austin Macdonald <austin@redhat.com>
…work#3650)

* Stopping reconciliation on rescue

* Added error check
…onciliation) (operator-framework#3729)

* Added fragments file

* Fragment file

* Changes
…tor-framework#3746)

internal/generate/clusterserviceversion/bases: set only `AllNamespaces` to `supported: true`
by default

*: update examples and testdata

docs/building-operators/golang/operator-scope.md: add section discussing namespaced CSV
…allSuccessful (operator-framework#3735)

Fixed a bug that caused the Helm operator not to set the `InstallSuccessful` and `UpgradeSuccessful` status reasons when the status update fails during installation and upgrade. Closes operator-framework#3728
…framework#3845)

**Description of the change:**
- Scorecard manifests created using the image with tags. 

**Motivation for the change:**

Closes: operator-framework#3840
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 17, 2020
@joelanford joelanford changed the base branch from master to v1.0.x September 17, 2020 13:00
@joelanford joelanford closed this Sep 17, 2020
@joelanford joelanford reopened this Sep 17, 2020
@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Sep 17, 2020
Copy link
Contributor

@camilamacedo86 camilamacedo86 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/lgtm

@openshift-ci-robot openshift-ci-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 17, 2020
@joelanford joelanford merged commit c48d05c into operator-framework:v1.0.x Sep 17, 2020
@joelanford joelanford deleted the v1.0.x-backports branch September 17, 2020 14:11
@joelanford joelanford added this to the v1.0.1 milestone Sep 17, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

7 participants