-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
(feat): Feature Management isFeatureEnabled Listener #271
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
19 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
d5de529
Added Listener In isFeatureEnabled
mnoman09 bbb38ba
Added getEnabledFeatures unitTests
mnoman09 d9b42d4
bug fix
mnoman09 f634e9f
Changed OnDecision enum to Decision
mnoman09 8250e95
Updated testcases and passed attributes empty instead of null in deci…
mnoman09 76f4e62
Did naming changes
mnoman09 c461797
Merge branch 'master' into mnoman/isFeatEnabledNotif
mfahadahmed 0c8e099
nit changes
mnoman09 0d841b6
Nit fix and added check of is listener Called
mnoman09 d3099aa
Merge branch 'master' into mnoman/isFeatEnabledNotif
mnoman09 a790882
Added builder pattern and refactored code
mnoman09 221cb90
Merge branch 'master' into mnoman/isFeatEnabledNotif
aliabbasrizvi 0593274
Merge branch 'master' into mnoman/isFeatEnabledNotif
mnoman09 8f07155
Merge branch 'master' into mnoman/isFeatEnabledNotif
mnoman09 e8b4500
Changed DecisionSource experiment to feature-test and added source_in…
mnoman09 5035ff0
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into mnoman/isFeatENotif…
mnoman09 6f08403
Nit fix
mnoman09 887ba63
Changed naming convention of decision Notification keys
mnoman09 d95af12
Merge branch 'master' into mnoman/isFeatEnabledNotif
aliabbasrizvi File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
May be remove these 2 build options and replace with
withSourceInfo
option which takesSourceInfo
object.You can then define 2 implementations
SourceInfo
. 1 for rollout and 1 for feature test and then use a get method on them to get the source info that you build in the builder here. That may be a better way to structure this.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Are you suggesting to make methods of get source info in optimizely or in DecisionNotification.java?
By the way I think current implementation is much simpler and fully utilizing builder pattern.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I am suggesting something like:
This may allow us to hopefully add more
SourceInfo
options in the future.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Discussed offline. This will happen in a follow up.