Skip to content

Get enabled features: Removes sorting #103

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom
Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2018
Merged

Get enabled features: Removes sorting #103

merged 2 commits into from
Apr 5, 2018

Conversation

rashidsp
Copy link
Contributor

@rashidsp rashidsp commented Apr 4, 2018

No description provided.

@optibot
Copy link

optibot commented Apr 4, 2018

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

1 similar comment
@optibot
Copy link

optibot commented Apr 4, 2018

Can one of the admins verify this patch?

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.002%) to 96.951% when pulling a73328b on rashid/remove-sorting into f12484a on master.

@coveralls
Copy link

coveralls commented Apr 4, 2018 •
edited
Loading

Coverage Status

Coverage decreased (-0.002%) to 96.951% when pulling f0aa5f0 on rashid/remove-sorting into 411c9a8 on master.

@mikeproeng37
Copy link
Contributor

build

mikeproeng37
mikeproeng37 approved these changes Apr 4, 2018
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Contributor

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

lgtm

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 merged commit bf1c5b2 into master Apr 5, 2018
@aliabbasrizvi aliabbasrizvi deleted the rashid/remove-sorting branch April 12, 2018 23:23
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
1 more reviewer

@mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 mikeproeng37 approved these changes

Reviewers whose approvals may not affect merge requirements
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
4 participants
@rashidsp @optibot @coveralls @mikeproeng37