Familiarity with "general relativity" and "quantum optics" #345
RedshiftDrift
started this conversation in
Polls
Replies: 0 comments
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
I am curious about the level of familiarity ACG members have with the physics of general relativity and quantum optics.
By "familiarity," I mean that you can read a paper that uses a specialized language, understand enough to know what the paper is about, and explain it at the layman's level to someone else.
(GR) I am familiar with General Relativity and associated vocabulary such as "spacetime", "relativistic addition of velocity", "gravitational redshift", "Ricci curvature", "geodesics", "energy-momentum", etc.
(QO) I am familiar with Quantum Optics and associated vocabulary such as "spontaneous emission", "stimulated emission", "Einstein's A and B coefficients", "photoelectric effect", "photon mode", "photon creation and destruction", etc.
P.S. I am not asking if you agree with these theories, only if you can read a paper and have a general understanding of what it is about.
2 votes ·
All reactions