Skip to content
Discussion options

You must be logged in to vote

The fact that Insights and the homepage disagree suggests separate cached or asynchronously refreshed data sources, not necessarily a remaining attribution in the reachable history. I would capture both views with timestamps, the repository default branch, and the latest commit SHA, then ask Support to route it as a repository metadata/indexing inconsistency. If the homepage card is generated from a cached contributor index, repeatedly rewriting history may not help and could make the evidence harder to compare; keeping the repository stable while waiting for an index refresh is safer.

Replies: 2 comments

Comment options

You must be logged in to vote
0 replies

This comment was marked as low quality.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Bug GitHub or a GitHub feature is not working as intended Repositories The core of version-controlled code storage source:ui Discussions created via Community GitHub templates
2 participants