GitHub Actions workflow stuck in queued state — force-cancel returns HTTP 409 #212792
Replies: 4 comments 2 replies
|
💬 Your Product Feedback Has Been Submitted 🎉 Thank you for taking the time to share your insights with us! Your feedback is invaluable as we build a better GitHub experience for all our users. Here's what you can expect moving forward ⏩
Where to look to see what's shipping 👀
What you can do in the meantime 💻
As a member of the GitHub community, your participation is essential. While we can't promise that every suggestion will be implemented, we want to emphasize that your feedback is instrumental in guiding our decisions and priorities. Thank you once again for your contribution to making GitHub even better! We're grateful for your ongoing support and collaboration in shaping the future of our platform. ⭐ |
|
Update — Workflow run appears to have become stuck during an official GitHub Actions incident I found an official GitHub Status incident that closely matches the exact time my workflow became stuck: https://www.githubstatus.com/incidents/dvy0t3mvh1lg Timeline (UTC):
However, as of November 13, my workflow is still stuck in Cancellation through the GitHub UI fails, and the official force-cancel endpoint returns HTTP 409:
Affected workflow: This strongly suggests that the run may have been left in an inconsistent state during the incident. Could a GitHub staff member investigate whether this run needs to be cleared or repaired on the server side? I would also appreciate guidance on whether it is safe to trigger a fresh CI run while this one remains stuck. Thank you for your assistance. |
|
That sounds like an inconsistent state between the workflow run shown in the GitHub UI and the state recognized by the cancellation API. A few things worth checking: Confirm whether the run is still queued by refreshing the Actions page and checking its latest status. Check whether other workflow runs in the same repository are starting normally. Review the repository’s Actions settings and any applicable concurrency settings to see whether another run or configuration is affecting execution. If the issue persists, provide GitHub Support with the run URL, timestamp, HTTP 409 response, and GitHub Request ID so they can investigate the server-side state. Since both the web cancellation and force-cancel attempt failed, GitHub Support may need to investigate and clear the inconsistent run state. I would avoid repeatedly sending cancellation requests. |
|
We also have 5 workflow runs in the same state. These are a direct result of the github incident that occurred and would like some prioritization on these. |
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
🏷️ Discussion Type
Bug
💬 Feature/Topic Area
Other
Discussion Details
Subject: GitHub Actions workflow stuck in queued state — cancellation and force-cancel return errors
Hello GitHub Support,
I am experiencing an issue with a GitHub Actions workflow in my private repository.
Repository: paolodevai/ControlloCantiere
Workflow: CI
Workflow run ID: 43098478389
Run URL: https://github.com/paolodevai/ControlloCantiere/actions/runs/43098478389
Pull request: #12
Commit SHA: 82a1c7c11e75a51633a8b3bc80548a0316d94907
Created: November 11, 2026, at 20:51:33 UTC
The workflow has remained in the
queuedstate without creating or starting any jobs.I attempted to cancel the workflow through the GitHub web interface, but received:
Failed to cancel workflow.I then made one attempt using the official force-cancel REST API endpoint:
POST /repos/paolodevai/ControlloCantiere/actions/runs/43098478389/force-cancelThe API returned:
HTTP 409 Conflict
Cannot cancel a workflow run that has not been queued yet.GitHub Request ID:
4014:10D831:36718A8:AD08150:6AF4E747The workflow still appears as
queued, with zero jobs and no status updates.The billing dashboard shows 287 GitHub Actions Linux minutes used this month, with $0 billed.
Could you please investigate this inconsistent workflow state and cancel or clear the stuck run on the server side?
I would also appreciate confirmation that new CI runs for this pull request can be triggered normally afterward.
Thank you for your assistance.
All reactions