Communication FT Weekly [2026-10-12]

[crimson11]

Participants

@bharatGoswami8
@Thomas-Mikhael
@NemanjaTrifunovicRTRK
@NEOatNHNG
@JochenSatETAS
@basheerFZ
@jorgecasal
@soldier-sky
@artem-rudskyy
@crimson11
@alexandruiulian10
@Rutuja-Patil-Bosch
@lurtz
@alberto-s-avila
@mariuswbr
@sahithi-nukala

Agenda

1. Status update SOME/IP
2. Status update Flatbuffers
3. Status update Rust API
4. Status Methods&Fields
5. Status CI/Infrastructure
6. Open bug tickets
7. Short notice topics

Meeting Minutes

to (1)

Existing PR still needs review by @crimson11.
Will do a coarse review til 13th October EOD

@basheerFZ: There is a poposal to use LG SOME/IP stack instead of vsomeip. It is field-poven.
@NEOatNHNG had a short look already and gave feedback, that API looks similar to vsomeip.
Feature set should be also roughly the same. So we need a pitch/detailed info, why we should switch over from vsomeip to LG SOME/IP.

to (2)

PR eclipse-score/communication#1270 shall be integrated with another PR, which contains further detailed tests. Separate by concise commits, which depend on each other.
Volunteer for review: @mariuswbr

to (3)

@bharatGoswami8:
Two more external crates being used:

eclipse-score/communication#1264
eclipse-score/communication#1263
Design and coverage has to be updated for these crates.

Design for methods and fields is done - now waiting for review!

to (4)

no updates.

to (5)

CI not yet updated. Waiting for dependent PRs.

to (6)

no new tickets since last week. Also no one raised a ticket discussion because being blocked by it.

to (7)

E2E discussion:
@soldier-sky presents setup with 2 proxies with different E2E profiles for the same service instance.
Discussion about the NoNewData error/state:
@soldier-sky will update the documents and mentions how "NoNewData" is "handled" in a polling case. I.e. an application calling GetNewSamples() cyclically (polling mode and NOT event driven).

Integration testing:
Matthias Kraemer: For score (Communication) it would be good to have a test suite, which runs all the existing unit/integration test WITHIN a given integration.
Matthias will come back to other a presentation, how this could be done/what changes on BULD level would be needed.
@FScholPer also showed interest on a broader SCORE scope (not just Communication).