-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 497
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feedback on Scorecard result data #792
Comments
in addition to whether issues are closed or commented on, etc I think when the repo has dependabot installed we would get some PRs merged once in a while. |
the statistics API may be useful to assess the activity of a repo https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#statistics |
increasing the time period may also be useful - related to #1025 |
this API may also be useful https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/activity |
another idea is to use the list of transitive deps, see if some have been updated and if the project has accepted dependabot PRs. That's pretty involved, though |
Stale issue message |
This issue is stale because it has been open for 60 days with no activity. |
Still relevant:
|
I had a conversation with Jose Duart from Google and he had some interesting observations on Scorecard data from BQ that he analyzed.
Not Active
, which is unexpected from a users POV. We probably need better signals to understand if repos areActive
or improve how we score these repos.Vulnerabilities
check simply tells if there is an open vulnerability or not. This is not a strong signal when considering a package as a dependency. A stronger signal might be something like - how long do the repo owners take on average to fix vulnerabilities once they become known.These might be interesting points to discuss in our next meeting, so creating an issue.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: