SecStreamInBodyInspection=On causes slow uploads

[tomsommer]

This post is still very very relevant: https://gryzli.info/2015/11/07/waf-modsecurity-slow-upload/
SecStreamInBodyInspection=On makes uploads extemely slow.

If this is unavoidable, then at the very least you should put a big fat warning on the usage of SecStreamInBodyInspection=on

Since StreamInBodyInspection cannot be controlled in ctl it's a big problem.

[bostrt]

@tomsommer Do you think adding something like below in docs would suffice?

Note: This directive may significantly impact file upload times due to added overhead. 

https://github.com/SpiderLabs/ModSecurity/wiki/Reference-Manual#secstreaminbodyinspection

[tomsommer]

Well, if this is working as intended, then yes.

[bostrt]

@tomsommer I tried running some tests myself but wasn't able to notice any performance impact. I do not doubt that there is a performance impact by enabling SecStreamInBodyInspection, my test just probably isn't decent.

Do you have a simple test you can share in here that others can see/test with?

(Would be great if the poster of https://gryzli.info/2015/11/07/waf-modsecurity-slow-upload/ would share their tests showing the 20x slow-down and high CPU usage)

Regarding the docs change, maybe we'll hold off on that until we can validate any slowdown.

[tomsommer]

It's been a while so I cannot find a testcase, however I can surely confirm this issue. I see the feature is removed in v3, for good reason I guess.

[tomsommer]

Maybe #1316 is related

[victorhora]

Yes SecStreamInBodyInspection directive is no longer supported on libModSecurity (aka v3). By default v3 will try to use stream whenever it is possible. I've added a note on the docs to reflect this a couple of weeks ago.

I agree with @bostrt it would be great if the poster of that blog could share his test cases with us. But anyways I think this might be a won't fix for 2.9.x as it's already fixed by libModSecurity. I'll tag @zimmerle here for him to confirm what's the case for this one.

[zimmerle]

Indeed, it shouldn't be a concern for v3.x. As of v2.x I believe that it is only really workable for Apache. Depends on your server resources and request type (size) keep things in memory may be computational expensive, even if it is about a chunk to perform a stream inspection. Hence, I don't think the slowness should be considerate as a bug, as it may be normal given an environment.

[bostrt]

@zimmerle do you think this thread warrants an update to the reference manual?

[zimmerle]

Hi @bostrt,

That may be a good idea. Do you want to perform the changes?

[bostrt]

@zimmerle Sure, I'll drop in a change today.

[zimmerle]

@bostrt thanks ;)