Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(linter) eslint-plugin-next no-async-client-component #1936

Conversation

camc314
Copy link
Collaborator

@camc314 camc314 commented Jan 7, 2024

No description provided.

Copy link

codspeed-hq bot commented Jan 8, 2024

CodSpeed Performance Report

Merging #1936 will not alter performance

Comparing c/01-07-feat_linter_eslint-plugin-next_no-async-client-component (30019fc) with main (c06d939)

Summary

✅ 14 untouched benchmarks

Copy link
Member

Boshen commented Jan 8, 2024

Merge activity

  • Jan 7, 10:49 PM: @Boshen started a stack merge that includes this pull request via Graphite.
  • Jan 7, 11:10 PM: Graphite rebased this pull request as part of a merge.
  • Jan 7, 11:13 PM: @Boshen merged this pull request with Graphite.

@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the c/01-07-feat_linter_eslint-plugin-next_no-assign-module-variable branch from abf5f42 to d676e23 Compare January 8, 2024 04:04
Base automatically changed from c/01-07-feat_linter_eslint-plugin-next_no-assign-module-variable to main January 8, 2024 04:09
@Boshen Boshen force-pushed the c/01-07-feat_linter_eslint-plugin-next_no-async-client-component branch from 7e48fb0 to 30019fc Compare January 8, 2024 04:09
@Boshen Boshen merged commit 149f53e into main Jan 8, 2024
16 checks passed
@Boshen Boshen deleted the c/01-07-feat_linter_eslint-plugin-next_no-async-client-component branch January 8, 2024 04:13
IWANABETHATGUY pushed a commit to IWANABETHATGUY/oxc that referenced this pull request May 29, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
A-linter Area - Linter
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants