Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Use standard messages instead of custom data structures #4

Closed
po1 opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 0 comments
Closed

Use standard messages instead of custom data structures #4

po1 opened this issue Feb 6, 2014 · 0 comments
Assignees
@adolfo-rt
Labels
enhancement
Milestone
0.4

Comments

@po1
Copy link
Contributor

po1 commented Feb 6, 2014

We have internal Trajectory and TrajectoryPoint structures, which are very close to JointTrajectory and JointTrajectoryPoint in trajectory_msgs.

By using the latter ones, we allow for easier extendability.
@po1 po1 added this to the 0.4 milestone Feb 6, 2014
adolfo-rt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 13, 2014
Use existing msg types for traj points. Refs #4.
7058a9b 
- Move from the custom structs to trajectory_msgs types.

- Waypoints can now have accelerations.
adolfo-rt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2014
Use existing msg types for traj points. Refs #4.
a63735b 
- Move from the custom structs to trajectory_msgs types.

- Waypoints can now have accelerations.
adolfo-rt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 18, 2014
Use existing msg types for traj points. Refs #4.
61b7704 
- Move from the custom structs to trajectory_msgs types.

- Waypoints can now have accelerations.
@po1 po1 mentioned this issue Feb 18, 2014
Merged
adolfo-rt pushed a commit that referenced this issue Feb 21, 2014
Merge pull request #13 from pal-robotics/use-ros-messages
22281a8 
Use existing msg types for traj points. (#4)
This issue was closed.
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@adolfo-rt adolfo-rt

Labels
enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
0.4
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@adolfo-rt @po1