Barh does not have "secondary_y" functionality

[JoshuaC3]

As seen in this stackoverflow post, you have two y-axes on a single bar plot by passing the name of a column to secondary_y. This makes a lots of sense.

When you try to do this to a barh plot, e.g. pass secondary_y, it has no effect on what would be the secondary_x axis.

Clearly there are nomenclature issues here (secondary_x vs y), as well as functionality issues, but it would be very nice to have the ability to plot barh with the secondary axis.

some more examples:

Horizontal Bar but with Poor Scaling:

Bar Chart with Good Scaling:

Bar Chart with Poor Scaling:

Cannot reproduce Horizontal Bar but with Good Scaling.

[mroeschke]

Thanks for the request but it appears this hasn't gotten traction in a while so closing