Skip to content

Conversation

chris-b1
Copy link
Contributor

@chris-b1 chris-b1 commented May 3, 2017

alt to #16193
closes #15854

This has the downside of introducing more manual memory management, but on the plus side removes the interim gil acquisition from some algos.

cc @mattip - if you could give this a try in PyPy? Thanks.

@mattip mattip mentioned this pull request May 4, 2017
@mattip
Copy link
Contributor

mattip commented May 4, 2017

I could not figure out a way to append to this pull request, so I started yet another one #16224

@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 4, 2017

superseded by #16224

@jreback jreback closed this May 4, 2017
@jreback
Copy link
Contributor

jreback commented May 4, 2017

you just force push to the same branch.

git push yourupstream branchname -f

@TomAugspurger TomAugspurger added this to the No action milestone May 27, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

COMPAT: hashtable vectors depend on refcount semantics which do not work on PyPy

4 participants