Correct test name for MLK holiday.

[julesjulian]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #16287 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #16287      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.39%   90.37%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       50863    50863              
==========================================
- Hits        45978    45969       -9     
- Misses       4885     4894       +9

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	88.16% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	40.32% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py	25% <0%> (-58.34%)	⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py	97.59% <0%> (-0.1%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9e57d91...d25c90a. Read the comment docs.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #16287 into master will decrease coverage by 0.01%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master   #16287      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   90.39%   90.37%   -0.02%     
==========================================
  Files         161      161              
  Lines       50863    50863              
==========================================
- Hits        45978    45969       -9     
- Misses       4885     4894       +9

Flag	Coverage Δ
#multiple	88.16% <ø> (ø)	⬆️
#single	40.32% <ø> (-0.11%)	⬇️

Impacted Files	Coverage Δ
pandas/io/gbq.py	25% <0%> (-58.34%)	⬇️
pandas/core/frame.py	97.59% <0%> (-0.1%)	⬇️

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 9e57d91...d25c90a. Read the comment docs.

[TomAugspurger]

Thanks!

[jorisvandenbossche]

@TomAugspurger just as a note, I don't think it is needed to tag such PRs as 0.20.2. I mean, this does not need to be backported as it is no essential bug fix. It's just more work to also backport such PRs.