-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 18.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BUG: Series.__getitem__ with downstream scalars #32684
Merged
Merged
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
Show all changes
6 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
29bc817
loosen scalar check in Series.__getitem__
jbrockmendel 75442c9
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into fi…
jbrockmendel efba858
Merge branch 'master' of https://github.com/pandas-dev/pandas into fi…
jbrockmendel b982835
test cases
jbrockmendel b4fbb2a
check differently, whatsnew, test
jbrockmendel b6bf039
remove unnecessary call, whatsnew but this time in the correct branch
jbrockmendel File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
this is really really sketch, why don't we just fix is_scalar?
also pls add a test if you can for this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Depends on what we want
is_scalar
to mean. We could re-writeis_scalar
to just match this (actually more performant than what we have now), but it isn't really viable to add checks for any custom scalar that downstream libraries might implement.Going to wait to hear from the downstream folks on if this actually solves their problem(s)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I actually think is_scalar should just be this its much more generic and future proof
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
hmm so changing is_scalar to just match this is breaking a bunch of tests bc
is_scalar(some_lambda_func)
is returning TrueThere was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
right you might need some more exclusions, e.g. callabes
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
so the trouble im facing ATM is that TimeGrouper is being recognized as a scalar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The more I look at this the more skeptical I am of trying to amend is_scalar
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
since we don't actually have a test case for this, am inclined to close.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
coming up with a test case isnt difficult, just need to settle on an approach.