Mark a test as requiring prefect

[shoyer]

No description provided.

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Merging #88 (2a9ca9b) into master (40f2aa9) will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master      #88   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   96.69%   96.69%           
=======================================
  Files          12       12           
  Lines         515      515           
  Branches       93       93           
=======================================
  Hits          498      498           
  Misses         11       11           
  Partials        6        6           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 40f2aa9...2a9ca9b. Read the comment docs.

[rabernat]

Thanks @shoyer!

In #82 we found ourselves wishing we had CI environments that tested more limited versions of dependencies (e.g. no prefect, no beam). Could I convince you to add such an environment in this PR to so we can verify that the tests are if fact being skipped as expected (rather than erroring)?

[shoyer]

I'd love to, but I'm not sure when I'll have time for that...

…

On Wed, Apr 28, 2021 at 10:59 AM Ryan Abernathey ***@***.***> wrote: Thanks @shoyer <https://github.com/shoyer>! In #82 <#82> we found ourselves wishing we had CI environments that tested more limited versions of dependencies (e.g. no prefect, no beam). Could I convince you to add such an environment in this PR to so we can verify that the tests are if fact being skipped as expected (rather than erroring)? — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#88 (comment)>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAJJFVXAIJ55BDPV4J3RI6LTLBEI7ANCNFSM43XRI6UQ> .

[shoyer]

I went ahead and added another CI environment with minimal test dependencies.