-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 21
kademlia: Track success of PUT_VALUE
queries
#427
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Open
dmitry-markin
wants to merge
15
commits into
master
Choose a base branch
from
dm-put-record-success
base: master
Could not load branches
Branch not found: {{ refName }}
Loading
Could not load tags
Nothing to show
Loading
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Some commits from the old base branch may be removed from the timeline,
and old review comments may become outdated.
Open
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
15 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
05318b9
minor: fix warnings in transport/manager
dmitry-markin f4259c8
Add `QueryId` field to `QueryAction::PutRecordToFoundNodes`
dmitry-markin 0874d72
Introduce `QueryType::PutRecordToFoundNodes`
dmitry-markin 269a807
Track `PUT_VALUE` responses and emit `PutRecordSucceeded`
dmitry-markin 7b2b2b4
Merge branch 'master' into dm-put-record-success
dmitry-markin de6e235
Send ACK responses to `PUT_VALUE` requests
dmitry-markin 22fad0b
Extend tests
dmitry-markin 5dc45cc
Clamp `Quorum::N` by number of discovered peers during `PUT_VALUE`
dmitry-markin 2459646
minor: typo
dmitry-markin 765883c
minor: revert feature flag fix now in master
dmitry-markin 6644f83
minor: make clippy happy
dmitry-markin 09317fc
Apply review suggestions
dmitry-markin 531926f
Apply more review suggestions
dmitry-markin 2bb7e88
Merge remote-tracking branch 'origin/master' into dm-put-record-success
dmitry-markin 988270b
Omit sending optional fields in `PUT_VALUE` ACK response
dmitry-markin File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
dq: Is libp2p sending the ACK as well? Im wondering if this is really needed, since we clone the record here and use some bandwidth?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this is what libp2p does. I don't understand either, why the whole message is sent back instead of a small ACK message.
Due to these ACKs not currentty being sent by litep2p we will likely need a two-stage upgrade process: first start sending out ACKs and use some alternative mechanism for determining if the record was received (not relying on ACKs being received), and after most of the network upgrades switch to using received ACKs. I am going to implement "stage 1" in a follow-up PR.