Numeric.LinearAlgebra.Static

[stites]

Excellent comparison, @pechersky! I might try to add in the staticly typed hmatrix bindings later, but I'm pretty backlogged so I wanted to bring it to your attention in case I don't get around to it in a timely manner. It's an experimental module with horrendous documentation (in hmatrix >= 0.18.0.0), but it lets you do type-safe linear algebra -- which I think is a huge selling point to the haskell ecosystem.

[pechersky]

Thanks for the feedback! Absolutely, the statically typed versions would be great examples, especially for the more-in-depth documentation of the numpy functions. Adding those examples is a matter of prioritization -- fill out the rest of the docs, or further elaborate existing examples with hTensor, static HMatrix, repa, accelerate, etc.

…

On Wed, Mar 22, 2017 at 11:00 AM, Sam Stites ***@***.***> wrote: Excellent comparison, @pechersky <https://github.com/pechersky>! I might try to add in the staticly typed hmatrix bindings later, but I'm pretty backlogged so I wanted to bring it to your attention in case I don't get around to it in a timely manner. It's an experimental module with horrendous documentation (in hmatrix >= 0.18.0.0), but it lets you do type-safe linear algebra -- which I think is a huge selling point to the haskell ecosystem. — You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#1>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFGDhhPE0nI24wUP9eq8mQ991pi4S5xZks5roTeSgaJpZM4MlVat> .

[stites]

Just a heads-up, I copied over hmatrix.hs to a hmatrix/static.hs and am at example 100 out of the original 233.