You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Not only does this numification run counter to popular interpretations of "Increase" and "Decrease", but also requires a different interpretation:
say 5 cmp 7
OUTPUT: Increase
(From the LHS, you must increase to get to the RHS)
say +(5 cmp 7)
OUTPUT: -1
(From the RHS, you must go down (subtract/add negative) to get to the LHS)
I don't know about you, but this weird numification of words in addition to the differing interpretation between the object and its numification is broken. I recommend Decrease == -1 and Increase == 1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
By current spec,
Not only does this numification run counter to popular interpretations of "Increase" and "Decrease", but also requires a different interpretation:
(From the LHS, you must increase to get to the RHS)
(From the RHS, you must go down (subtract/add negative) to get to the LHS)
I don't know about you, but this weird numification of words in addition to the differing interpretation between the object and its numification is broken. I recommend Decrease == -1 and Increase == 1.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: