Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

🛠 Tooling: Evaluate and choose a styling system #84

Open
3 tasks done
JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #85
Open
3 tasks done

🛠 Tooling: Evaluate and choose a styling system #84

JoshuaKGoldberg opened this issue Jan 2, 2024 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #85

Comments

@JoshuaKGoldberg
Copy link
Contributor

JoshuaKGoldberg commented Jan 2, 2024

Bug Report Checklist

  • I have tried restarting my IDE and the issue persists.
  • I have pulled the latest main branch of the repository.
  • I have searched for related issues and found none that matched my issue.

Overview

Splitting out of #69 as a prerequisite: in order to support implementing a holistic design system, I'd like to use a styling system framework. I've used them in the past (see: Codecademy's Gamut) and, although they take some energy + time to ramp up on, they make it a lot easier to build an extensible + type-safe design system.

Right now there seem to be four five popular ones in the wild, all early-stage (🙃):

I'd like to make a draft PR for each of these, showing how it'd look with our current website. We can then evaluate as a team which one we like - if any.

Additional Info

No response

@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg self-assigned this Jan 2, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg changed the title 🛠 Tooling: <short description of the change> 🛠 Tooling: Evaluate and choose a styling system Jan 2, 2024
@JoshuaKGoldberg JoshuaKGoldberg linked a pull request Jan 2, 2024 that will close this issue
3 tasks
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

1 participant