Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Agg vs gold fixes #70

Merged
merged 34 commits into from
Apr 29, 2015
Merged

Agg vs gold fixes #70

merged 34 commits into from
Apr 29, 2015

Conversation

drammock
Copy link
Member

This adds a test script to compare the "gold standard" database dump with the output of the aggregation script, and fixes some of the problems that it reveals (though not yet all). Should not be merged yet, until we figure out what to do about the remaning discrepancies between agg and gold. Note that most of the remaining discrepancies are due to the UPSID "dental|alveolar" agnosticism.

You can test this locally with
git checkout -b testAggGold drammock/agg-vs-gold-fixes
(assuming you have a remote called drammock that points to drammock/phoible repo).

@drammock
Copy link
Member Author

Closes #49

@drammock
Copy link
Member Author

This now tests gold standard vs. the aggregation RData output with all of the ISO code fixes in place (i.e., it behaves as if this PR and #68 have both been merged already). With those ISO code fixes in place, the agg vs. gold disparity is down to 4 languages present in gold but not in agg, and 15 inventories with discrepancies between agg & gold.

@drammock
Copy link
Member Author

@bambooforest, it's probably time to merge this before things get any more tangled. There are still a few agg vs gold differences, but they'll be easier to see once this is merged and I can look at it afresh.

@bambooforest
Copy link
Contributor

I agree. Will review and merge.

bambooforest added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 29, 2015
@bambooforest bambooforest merged commit c092614 into phoible:master Apr 29, 2015
@drammock drammock deleted the agg-vs-gold-fixes branch April 30, 2015 01:36
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants