Skip to content

Added locking section #5

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 19, 2017
Merged

Added locking section #5

merged 2 commits into from
May 19, 2017

Conversation

wachterjohannes
Copy link
Member

locking.rst Outdated
@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
Locking
=======
To avoid concurrency issue the library is able to lock other executions which
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

issues, the library

locking.rst Outdated
Locking
=======
To avoid concurrency issue the library is able to lock other executions which
would run at the same time. This could happen if multiple worker (e.g. cronjobs)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

workers

symfony.rst Outdated
@@ -79,23 +79,34 @@ supported.
After addition or changing in the config you have to run the command again
to be sure that the task-table will be updated.

Locking
-------
Locking is used to avoid concurrency problems when multiple task-runner runs at
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

task-runners run at

symfony.rst Outdated
handler_class: ~
workload: null
cron_expression: ~
locking:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Does locking replace system_tasks?

@wachterjohannes
Copy link
Member Author

@danrot fixed

@wachterjohannes
Copy link
Member Author

@danrot ping

@danrot danrot merged commit 3392c55 into master May 19, 2017
@danrot danrot deleted the feature/lock branch May 19, 2017 12:33
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants