Add octal-prefix grammar to support "0o" and "0O" #258
Conversation
|
这是来自QQ邮箱的假期自动回复邮件。
您好，我最近正在休假中，无法亲自回复您的邮件。我将在假期结束后，尽快给您回复。
|
| @@ -440,9 +440,12 @@ decimal-literal:: | |||
| decimal-literal digit | |||
|
|
|||
| octal-literal:: | |||
| '0' | |||
| octal-prefix octal-digit | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It seems like a plain 0 now doesn't match any of the rules anymore?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Plain 0 is included in octal-prefix.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
It is, but it now has to be followed by octal-digit, so only 00 would be valid, not plain 0.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Oh, I see what you’re saying. Under what circumstances should a single digit 0 be interpreted as octal and not decimal?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
(Regardless of my question, I think removing the plain 0 by itself was an oversight on my part and not intentional.)
There was a problem hiding this comment.
For 0 the decimal and octal interpretation is the same, so it doesn't really matter which it is, as long as it's one of them. In the grammar it's probably easier to express as octal.
No description provided.