Re-license to MIT as declared into composer.json #9
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Signed-off-by: William Desportes <williamdes@wdes.fr>
MauricioFauth
approved these changes
Jan 14, 2021
There was a problem hiding this comment.
All the code from version 1.x was removed in the version 2.x. The version 2 is heavily based on the Doctrine Coding Standard which is MIT licensed.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
The composer.json says it is MIT since the first commits. (5014ac0)
coding-standard/composer.json
Line 5 in b1554ea
But the license is a BSD-3-clause and GitHub did sniff that correctly
Either the license needs to be changed or composer.json updated