Skip to content

Conversation

rvanvelzen
Copy link
Contributor

@rvanvelzen
Copy link
Contributor Author

Perhaps this should target 1.5.x?

@staabm
Copy link
Contributor

staabm commented Mar 31, 2022

just to make sure it isn't forgotten: regarding named arguments there is some other work prepared in #750 , where we also had some discussion.

this PR touches other files though, so it seems there is no overlap and everything is fine.

@ondrejmirtes ondrejmirtes changed the base branch from 1.6.x to 1.5.x March 31, 2022 13:39
@ondrejmirtes
Copy link
Member

I rebased it on top of 1.5.x because yeah, this is just a bugfix :)

@ondrejmirtes
Copy link
Member

Thank you very much! The logic seems too easy but I wasn't able to find any flaw in it.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Wrong return type in template function with optional named parameters
3 participants