Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add "no-daemon" option #42

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2017
Merged

Add "no-daemon" option #42

merged 1 commit into from
May 10, 2017

Conversation

DL6ER
Copy link
Member

@DL6ER DL6ER commented May 10, 2017

By submitting this pull request, I confirm the following (please check boxes, eg [X]) Failure to fill the template will close your PR:

Please submit all pull requests against the development branch. Failure to do so will delay or deny your request

  • I have read and understood the contributors guide.
  • I have checked that another pull request for this purpose does not exist.
  • I have considered, and confirmed that this submission will be valuable to others.
  • I accept that this submission may not be used, and the pull request closed at the will of the maintainer.
  • I give this submission freely, and claim no ownership to its content.

How familiar are you with the codebase?: 10


Add "no-daemon" resp. "-f" option to prevent FTL forking itself into background. Connected to #35

This template was created based on the work of udemy-dl.

@DL6ER DL6ER merged commit 4cef1a9 into development May 10, 2017
@DL6ER DL6ER deleted the new/no-daemon branch May 10, 2017 22:21
DL6ER added a commit that referenced this pull request May 12, 2017
* Restructure code such that cast is not necessary for qsort comparison function (#41)

* Add "no-daemon" resp. "-f" option to prevent FTL forking itself into background (#42)

* Replace all fgets() calls by readline() to become independent of all existing line length limitations (#43)

* Add musl target to Travis CI (#44)
DL6ER pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Oct 14, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant