Repository navigation
Replies: 2 comments
|
To make this concrete I built a small working version in my fork. I have not opened a PR; I'm waiting to hear if a board is wanted at all. Branch: https://github.com/romanzdk/t3code/tree/feature/thread-status-board (one commit on top of main, 9 files, +366 −3, web only) What it is
Before / after (generic demo projects and the free Replay provider, no real data) Before: status is a label on each row of the list. After: the same threads grouped by status. One thread asks a question, one is running, three are finished. Checks
Not in this version
Would a maintainer be OK with this as a small web-first PR? Built with Claude Opus 5.5 in Claude Code. |
|
Proposal: threads as a board, a second view of the thread list I'd like to add a new way to see threads: a board with columns by status (Needs you, Working, Waiting, Failed, Done). Today the status is a small label on each row, so to find the threads that wait for me I have to read the whole list. On a board, I just look at the column. You don't move cards by hand: each card's column comes from the status T3 Code already shows, so the board always matches the list. It is not a new page. It is the same sidebar, only wider: drag it past 560 px and the list turns into the board, drag it back and the list returns. Cards are the normal sidebar rows, and the open thread stays next to the board. An optional button next to New thread makes the sidebar 70% of the window wide. The board is off by default. The setting has three options: Off, On, and On with button. How it looks board-v2.mp4
How it differs from the existing versions
Ask Would you consider this direction? The code passes Built with Claude Code (Claude Opus 5.5). |





Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Before submitting
Area
apps/web (desktop wraps it); mobile later, if wanted
Problem or use case
With many threads running, the sidebar is a long list. To answer "which threads are waiting on me?" I scan every row for the small status label. The answer is already in T3 (Pending Approval, Awaiting Input, Plan Ready, Working, Waiting, Failed, Completed), but it is spread across the list instead of grouped.
#31520 shows the same need: they sort their threads into status groups in a separate board they maintain by hand. #853 asked for a Kanban board a while ago and was closed for lack of interest. This is a much smaller thing than that.
Proposal
An optional Board view next to the thread list. It shows the same threads in columns:
resolveThreadStatusPill), so there is no new status model, no new data and no server change.Not proposed: agents that move cards, a workflow engine, issue tracker sync (that is #30981), or custom columns.
Would a maintainer be OK with this as a small PR (web first)? If a board is not wanted at all, a "Needs you first" sort in the sidebar would cover most of it, and I can propose that instead.
All reactions