Repository navigation
Replies: 2 comments
|
Note 🤖 Composer responding on behalf of wSedlacek Prior effort: #30660. What we learned trying it
|
0 replies
|
Why is the editor choice a hardcoded list? I mean, we can make it very long and will not be enough. What about have the "Open In" configurable by the user? The Does it makes sense? I mean, I use neovim, but also use code-server, and used openvscode-server in the past. I do not think that it all should be supported and hardcoded in T3. |
0 replies
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Uh oh!
There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.
Summary
This discussion asks for a direction decision. Should Open In grow Neovim and Neovide targets so a file or project opens in those editors the same way it opens in VS Code / Cursor today?
This is a small Open In addition, not in-app vim (#35228). #30660 was a prior attempt.
Why Neovim / Neovide in Open In
A large share of T3 users live in Neovim. Open In already abstracts “open this path in the user’s editor” with the right cwd (and remote host when applicable). Shipping Neovim and Neovide closes an obvious gap without a new product surface.
Neovide fits the existing detected-GUI-editor path. Terminal Neovim wants a path that opens in the thread’s built-in terminal (optional line/column) using the server/environment cwd — otherwise remote projects open the wrong tree.
Proposal
Reference implementation
#30660 added Neovim/Neovide Open In targets. Linked as evidence only.
Question for maintainers
Yes, no, or not now: Neovim and Neovide as Open In targets.
All reactions