New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add installation guide for namespaced mode #1840
Conversation
See [values.yaml](https://github.com/pipe-cd/manifests/blob/master/manifests/piped/values.yaml) for the full values. | ||
|
||
### Installing on Kubernetes cluster in the namespaced mode | ||
The previous way requires installing cluster-level resources. If you want to restrict Piped's permission within the namespace as the same as Piped, this way is for you. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
nits,
The previous way requires installing Piped as cluster-level resource.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
For sure, but honestly I don't know exactly which is better. Most of Piped resources are namespace-level then only Role/ClusterRole
and RoleBindings/ClusterRoleBindings
can be different, that's why I thought "installing cluster-level resources" is kind of suitable for it. No strong opinion though 😃
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I get your point 👍 then keep it as is LGTM 🙆♀️ I don't have a strong objection to this
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@khanhtc1202 Thanks!
/lgtm |
/approve |
/changelog |
@nghialv: Changelog has been generated in response to this comment. DetailsChangelog since v0.9.10Notable ChangesInternal Changes
|
What this PR does / why we need it:
Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Ref: #1830
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: