Skip to content

Conversation

nexus49
Copy link
Contributor

@nexus49 nexus49 commented Sep 30, 2025

Context

Sometimes a subroutine will only selectively set a finalizers and needs to consider values on the instance for that decision.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Refactor
    • Made finalizer processing instance-aware to improve accuracy and consistency during resource lifecycle operations. No changes to user workflows or configuration. Upgrade is seamless.
  • Tests
    • Updated tests to validate instance-aware finalizer behavior while preserving existing scenarios and outcomes.
  • Chores
    • Internal alignment of lifecycle components on the new instance-aware approach, preparing for future enhancements without affecting current functionality.

@nexus49 nexus49 requested review from a team as code owners September 30, 2025 06:17
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Sep 30, 2025

Walkthrough

Method signature Finalizers() is updated to Finalizers(instance runtimeobject.RuntimeObject) across the lifecycle controller, its subroutine interface, implementations, and tests. Call sites now pass the instance argument. No other logic or behavior changes are introduced.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Lifecycle controller updates
controller/lifecycle/lifecycle.go
Refactors all calls to subroutine.Finalizers() to subroutine.Finalizers(instance); updates contains/remove/add finalizer helpers accordingly.
Subroutine interface change
controller/lifecycle/subroutine/subroutine.go
Changes Subroutine interface: Finalizers() → Finalizers(instance runtimeobject.RuntimeObject) []string.
Lifecycle tests adaptation
controller/lifecycle/lifecycle_test.go
Updates tests to pass instance to Finalizers and related assertions.
Test support: single subroutine
controller/testSupport/finalizerSubroutine.go
Updates FinalizerSubroutine method signature to Finalizers(_ runtimeobject.RuntimeObject) []string; body unchanged.
Test support: multiple subroutines
controller/testSupport/testSupport.go
Updates Finalizers signatures for ChangeStatusSubroutine, AddConditionSubroutine, FailureScenarioSubroutine, ContextValueSubroutine to accept instance; bodies unchanged.

Estimated code review effort

🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 0.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title Check ✅ Passed The title succinctly captures the core enhancement—subroutines can now use the provided instance when determining finalizers—and aligns with conventional commit style without unnecessary detail.
Description Check ✅ Passed Check skipped - CodeRabbit’s high-level summary is enabled.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/pass-instance-to-get-name

Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share
🧪 Early access (Sonnet 4.5): enabled

We are currently testing the Sonnet 4.5 model, which is expected to improve code review quality. However, this model may lead to increased noise levels in the review comments. Please disable the early access features if the noise level causes any inconvenience.

Note:

  • Public repositories are always opted into early access features.
  • You can enable or disable early access features from the CodeRabbit UI or by updating the CodeRabbit configuration file.

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@nexus49 nexus49 merged commit 5db8915 into main Sep 30, 2025
10 checks passed
@nexus49 nexus49 deleted the feat/pass-instance-to-get-name branch September 30, 2025 06:21
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants