Skip to content

Conversation

platisd
Copy link
Owner

@platisd platisd commented Nov 30, 2022

No description provided.

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch 8 times, most recently from 33fe243 to 5f92e09 Compare November 30, 2022 20:19
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 5f92e09 to 821b518 Compare November 30, 2022 20:26
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 30, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 47121df to 821b518 Compare November 30, 2022 20:28
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 30, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 821b518 to d8b46f4 Compare November 30, 2022 20:40
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 30, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from d8b46f4 to 7c53c91 Compare November 30, 2022 20:44
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 30, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 7c53c91 to d6e9e74 Compare November 30, 2022 21:26
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 30, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Nov 30, 2022
@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch 4 times, most recently from 26c167c to 07e5e2f Compare November 30, 2022 22:49
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 2, 2022

Codecov Report

Base: 100.00% // Head: 100.00% // No change to project coverage 👍

Coverage data is based on head (7ac4cca) compared to base (2225f1b).
Patch coverage: 100.00% of modified lines in pull request are covered.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main        #1   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files            1         1           
  Lines          206       206           
=========================================
  Hits           206       206           
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
include/CommandParser.h 100.00% <100.00%> (ø)

Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here.

☔ View full report at Codecov.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 05c94a7 to b065a9d Compare December 2, 2022 21:04
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from b065a9d to 3d42f52 Compare December 2, 2022 22:02
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 2, 2022
@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 3d42f52 to 80f8b18 Compare December 2, 2022 22:08
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 80f8b18 to 4285a52 Compare December 8, 2022 23:40
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 8, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 8, 2022
@platisd platisd force-pushed the bad_change_to_test_clang-tidy-action branch from 4285a52 to 2e32f19 Compare December 8, 2022 23:58
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 9, 2022
Repository owner deleted a comment from github-actions bot Dec 9, 2022
Copy link

@github-actions github-actions bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ clang-tidy found issue(s) with the introduced code (1/1)

@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@ template <class... Ts>
class ArrayWrapper
{
public:
explicit constexpr ArrayWrapper(Ts... ts)
constexpr ArrayWrapper(Ts... ts)
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ google-explicit-constructor ⚠️
constructors that are callable with a single argument must be marked explicit to avoid unintentional implicit conversions

Suggested change
constexpr ArrayWrapper(Ts... ts)
constexpr explicit ArrayWrapper(Ts... ts)

Comment on lines +314 to 316
} else {
return sizeof...(Args);
}
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

⚠️ readability-else-after-return ⚠️
do not use else after return

Suggested change
} else {
return sizeof...(Args);
}
} return sizeof...(Args);

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant