om/om.next

[Nondv]

Hello!

Correct me if I'm wrong but chestnut includes om.next by default.
So README is a bit confusing.

[featheredtoast]

om gets used by default, not om.next.

What is the confusion and where are you seeing om.next?

[Nondv]

@featheredtoast hi!
Isn't om.next just a om with version 1.0.0+ ?
If so that means that om.next gets used by default, not om

[plexus]

Om next uses different namespaces. @featheredtoast is right, we default to classic om.

…

On Dec 20, 2017 4:09 AM, "Dmitriy Non" ***@***.***> wrote: @featheredtoast <https://github.com/featheredtoast> hi! Isn't om.next just a om with version 1.0.0+ ? If so that means that om.next gets used by default, not om — You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#228 (comment)>, or mute the thread <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB91A7E1RjXhJ_fa9xxEkx959GBsAf1ks5tCHp8gaJpZM4REmY-> .

[Nondv]

ok, nice.
thank you both