-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 118
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
A variant of \DeclareSortExclusion
#482
Comments
Ps: by the way, I think my variation of nty should be the default one. |
For now, I am able to manage it with
But I am not sur that is the best way. |
Please try biblatex 3.7 and biber 2.7 from SF. You can do what you want with:
See the docs for |
many thanks. I will try this week-end, I hope. Le 23 sept. 2016 � 11:39, plk notifications@github.com a �crit :
|
I have tried with my example, and it's work.
Many thanks |
DeclareSortExclusion
allow to exclude some field from sorting for specific entry-type. Should it be possible to have a variant, which will exclude field from entry-type which are not passed as argument.Here a MWE to understand my need.
My changes on the
nty
field is required if I want to have a good position for the entryA
. However, if I don't do add\DeclareSortExclusion{bookinbook}{maintitle}
, there is a problem for the sorting ofA3
entry. However, I think it will be better to tell to biber "take account ofmaintitle
only for @book entries", than to tell it "take account ofmaintitle
for all entries except these one`.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: