-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 303
Time value unmap #425
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Time value unmap #425
Conversation
I just realized that for tiny periods (some thousand nanoseconds and below), my solution does not work well, I will fix this during the day. |
If have update the PR to work also for small time periods and removed the unnecessary |
Thanks looks good overall! Yet, I'm really not sure whether the master branch is the right place for this. So far, the master branch is only for the current 0.3 stable series and this would be a breaking change, even though most users probably wouldn't notice... |
I can't see how this changes may break any existing code (basically I just add some functionality). However, if you still prefer to base the changes on the next-release-devel branch, I will just do that, it's no big deal. |
Hm, simple rebase does not work since next-release-devel is based on 0.3.2, while master is already on 0.3.4. Apparently, features have been added to master after creating next-release-devel. Therefore, I have prepared a new PR with the same chnages based on the next-release-devel branch. |
Honestly, I might have been wrong with this. It looked to me like the Can you try to remove the |
That does not seem to work, since |
Adding methods to a trait that can't be implemented externally in not a breaking change. I don't see how this could break any existing code. |
So what is your suggestion? Re-opening the PR and merge the changes to master as well or wait till the development branch is merged to master? |
I think, since the work is already done we should merge this into master so this can make it's way into the next release of the current stable series. |
Thanks! |
This pull request fixes issue #421 by implementing
unmap
andReversibleRanged
forTimeValue
types.