Skip to content

Add discord link as discussed #708

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025
Merged

Add discord link as discussed #708

merged 1 commit into from
Feb 17, 2025

Conversation

CoMPaTech
Copy link
Member

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech commented Feb 16, 2025

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Documentation
    • Clarified terminology to improve readability regarding ownership.
    • Expanded the supported device information by specifying available hubs.
    • Introduced a new community badge to promote engagement via Discord.

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech requested a review from a team as a code owner February 16, 2025 16:26
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Walkthrough

This pull request updates the project’s README file by clarifying and expanding its textual content. The phrase “co-code owners” is corrected to “code owners.” Additionally, the list of supported devices now explicitly includes Hubs like “Adam” and “Smile for Anna and P1.” A new badge for the Plugwise Discord channel has been added to encourage community engagement. No changes were made to the declarations of exported or public entities.

Changes

File(s) Change Summary
README.md Clarified text by replacing "co-code owners" with "code owners", expanded supported device details (Adam, Smile for Anna, P1), and added a Plugwise Discord badge.

Possibly related PRs

  • Update README.md #571: Involved similar modifications to the README, focusing on badge additions and content updates.

Suggested labels

documentation

Suggested reviewers

  • bouwew

Poem

I'm a hopping rabbit, full of cheer,
Leaping through docs with a message so clear.
A tweak here and a badge there,
Makes README bloom with a flair!
Celebrate these changes with a twitch of my ear 🐇✨


📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between ee617fc and f656f77.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • README.md (1 hunks)
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
  • README.md
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (1)
  • GitHub Check: Check commit

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai or @coderabbitai title anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 100.00%. Comparing base (ee617fc) to head (f656f77).
Report is 2 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##              main      #708   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage   100.00%   100.00%           
=========================================
  Files           21        21           
  Lines         3418      3418           
=========================================
  Hits          3418      3418           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@bouwew bouwew left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Great, thanks!

@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Feb 17, 2025
@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech merged commit 70c72a4 into main Feb 17, 2025
19 checks passed
@CoMPaTech CoMPaTech deleted the dc branch February 17, 2025 13:08
@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot mentioned this pull request Feb 18, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
documentation Improvements or additions to documentation
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants