-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 139
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ndctl create-namespace over NVDIMM-N fails #78
Comments
Hmm, could you also add the output of dmesg? |
Attaching the dmesg collected after the create-namspace failure. |
Unfortunately nothing interesting in that dmesg. Can you do the following: ndctl disable-region all ...and then send the result of dmesg after attempting to create a namespace. That should capture detailed debug information. |
Had some trouble to unloading nfit, so used boot param - |
Not sure if this helps.. |
When you sanitized nvdimm's from BIOS, did you end up with default namespaces, something like "namespace0.0", which were then deleted by you to free up space in the region ? May be your nvdimm's don't support labels. Which h/w platform are you using ? |
No. After sanitizing the NVDIMMs, no namespaces come automatically after boot. I can see only the regions as mentioned in Description. It is a Dell PowerEdge 14G server, it does support NVDIMM-N. |
Point to note - the change introduced by latest nvdimm fw- With the previous fw, there were no labels implemented by the platform and pmem/namespaces were auto enumerated. |
Hi, I'm not seeing the namespace creation attempt in the log, however I do see a potential BIOS problem. The BIOS reports that ARS is complete to an "ARS Status" request, but any attempt to perform "ARS Start" returns "Busy". If ARS is busy then "ARS Status" should say so and Linux will exponentially back-off on the polling interval otherwise Linux will retry every second until ARS start succeeds. Back to the namespace creation problem... Can you retry the capture with just "libnvdimm.dyndbg=+fp", i.e. drop the "nfit.dyndbg=+fp". You can mark in dmesg where the namespace creation attempt starts by doing something like: echo "===== creating namespace ========" > /dev/kmsg |
I had to give up the original setup. Got a new setup having the same repro. |
Always the very first create-namespace try after reboot fails with 'inappropriate ioctl', further tries fails with 'Device busy' |
I think this is a case where the DIMM does not have an index-block initialized. When ndctl attempts to initialize the index-block it uses a routine that assumes a 128K label area. For a 1K label area it needs a fix that was already made to the kernel, but was never duplicated in ndctl. I pushed out a branch: https://github.com/pmem/ndctl/tree/issues/78 ...with a proposed fix. Let me know if that fixes it for you. You might need to perform the following to get the labels initialized: ndctl disable-region all |
No luck. #ndctl disable-region all #ndctl init-labels all #ndctl enable-region all #ndctl create-namespace -r "region0" -f #ndctl create-namespace -r "region0" -f |
ah, sorry add the --force option to init-labels:
|
Actually I too missed out mentioning it here: Logs indicate ioctl failure. |
Thanks for that. This shows the ioctl failure is specific to the label write path. Can you send the output of the following: cd /sys/bus/nd/devices/nmem0/ |
#cat commands #cat nfit/dsm_mask #cat nfit/family |
I think I might see the kernel bug. Can you try the following setting the override_dsm_mask ndctl disable-region all The kernel is improperly assuming the DIMM write commands are not supported. |
I don't know if this is a defect or not but I cannot unload the nfit nor the libnvdimm. Both seems to have a cyclic dependency on each other. Anyways, I booted with this kernel param "nfit.override_dsm_mask=0x4003c7f" #cat /proc/cmdline Same failure is seen. #ndctl create-namespace -r "region0" -f #ndctl create-namespace -r "region0" -f |
Well, at least you're finding more kernel bugs and making it clear that I need to get one of these platforms for a regression environment. It turns out that override_dsm_mask does not force enable the DSMs. You'll need to recompile the driver, and I think this one line change will address the problem:
|
Verified in a couple of different Dell servers, where the issue was originally seen, that with the above kernel fix over v4.20.1, create-namespace works fine using ndctl v62. |
Had the same problem on an ubuntu 18.04.1 and a Dell PowerEdge R840. Many Thanks ! |
The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Cc: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Quoting from Linux kernel commit 9e694d9c18dd "libnvdimm, label: change nvdimm_num_label_slots per UEFI 2.7": sizeof_namespace_index() fails when NVDIMM devices have the minimum 1024 bytes label storage area. nvdimm_num_label_slots() returns 3 slots while the area is only big enough for 2 slots. Change nvdimm_num_label_slots() to calculate a number of label slots according to UEFI 2.7 spec. Without this fix attempts to initialize labels on a small (1K) label area results in the following: libndctl: sizeof_namespace_index: nmem2: label area (1024) too small to host (128 byte) labels libndctl: sizeof_namespace_index: nmem2: label area (1024) too small to host (256 byte) labels Based on an original patch by Toshi Kani Fixes: bdaec95 ("ndctl: introduce ndctl_dimm_{validate_labels,init_labels}") Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Link: #78 Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>
The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
…inux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm Pull libnvdimm fixes from Dan Williams: "A fix for namespace label support for non-Intel NVDIMMs that implement the ACPI standard label method. This has apparently never worked and could wait for v5.1. However it has enough visibility with hardware vendors [1] and distro bug trackers [2], and low enough risk that I decided it should go in for -rc4. The other fixups target the new, for v5.0, nvdimm security functionality. The larger init path fixup closes a memory leak and a potential userspace lockup due to missed notifications. [1] pmem/ndctl#78 [2] https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/linux/+bug/1811785 These have all soaked in -next for a week with no reported issues. Summary: - Fix support for NVDIMMs that implement the ACPI standard label methods. - Fix error handling for security overwrite (memory leak / userspace hang condition), and another one-line security cleanup" * tag 'libnvdimm-fixes-5.0-rc4' of git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/nvdimm/nvdimm: acpi/nfit: Fix command-supported detection acpi/nfit: Block function zero DSMs libnvdimm/security: Require nvdimm_security_setup_events() to succeed nfit_test: fix security state pull for nvdimm security nfit_test
The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: HouHongxun <houhongxun@gmail.com>
Fixed as of kernel v5.0-rc4. |
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76ba2fc ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
commit 11189c1089da413aa4b5fd6be4c4d47c78968819 upstream. The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
jira LE-1907 Rebuild_History Non-Buildable kernel-4.18.0-80.el8 commit-author Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> commit 11189c1 Empty-Commit: Cherry-Pick Conflicts during history rebuild. Will be included in final tarball splat. Ref for failed cherry-pick at: ciq/ciq_backports/kernel-4.18.0-80.el8/11189c10.failed The _DSM function number validation only happens to succeed when the generic Linux command number translation corresponds with a DSM-family-specific function number. This breaks NVDIMM-N implementations that correctly implement _LSR, _LSW, and _LSI, but do not happen to publish support for DSM function numbers 4, 5, and 6. Recall that the support for _LS{I,R,W} family of methods results in the DIMM being marked as supporting those command numbers at acpi_nfit_register_dimms() time. The DSM function mask is only used for ND_CMD_CALL support of non-NVDIMM_FAMILY_INTEL devices. Fixes: 31eca76 ("nfit, libnvdimm: limited/whitelisted dimm command...") Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org> Link: pmem/ndctl#78 Reported-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Tested-by: Sujith Pandel <sujith_pandel@dell.com> Reviewed-by: Vishal Verma <vishal.l.verma@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Jeff Moyer <jmoyer@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> (cherry picked from commit 11189c1) Signed-off-by: Jonathan Maple <jmaple@ciq.com> # Conflicts: # drivers/acpi/nfit/core.c
Description:
I have a freshly erased and factory reset (through BIOS settings) 2x 16GB NVDIMM-Ns.
Boot to kernel-4.20 installed over RHEL 7.6
Check the presence of nmems -
#ls /dev/nmem*
/dev/nmem0 /dev/nmem1
Check the presence of regions -
#ndctl list -R
[
{
"dev":"region1",
"size":17179869184,
"available_size":17179869184,
"max_available_extent":17179869184,
"type":"pmem",
"iset_id":6272005994369602076,
"persistence_domain":"unknown"
},
{
"dev":"region0",
"size":17179869184,
"available_size":17179869184,
"max_available_extent":17179869184,
"type":"pmem",
"iset_id":6274820741989552668,
"persistence_domain":"unknown"
}
]
Try creating namespaces:
#ndctl create-namespace -r region0 -f -vvvv
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: base: /sys/class/nd dev: ndctl
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: ndctl0: processed
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: base: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0 dev: region
libndctl: to_module: alias: nd:t2 module: libnvdimm
libndctl: region_set_type: region0: iset-0x5714a4382b8a521c added
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to open /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/persistence_domain: No such file or directory
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: region0: processed
libndctl: to_module: alias: nd:t2 module: libnvdimm
libndctl: region_set_type: region1: iset-0x570aa438ab85521c added
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to open /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region1/persistence_domain: No such file or directory
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: region1: processed
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: base: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0 dev: pfn0.
libndctl: to_module: alias: nd:t5 module: nd_pmem
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to read /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/pfn0.0/resource: No such device or address
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to read /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/pfn0.0/size: No such device or address
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: pfn0.0: processed
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: base: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0 dev: dax0.
libndctl: to_module: alias: nd:t7 module: dax_pmem
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to read /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/dax0.0/resource: No such device or address
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to read /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/dax0.0/size: No such device or address
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: dax0.0: processed
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: base: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0 dev: namespace0.
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to read /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/namespace0.0/resource: No such device or address
libndctl: parse_lbasize_supported: namespace0.0: 512 4096
libndctl: to_module: alias: nd:t5 module: nd_pmem
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: namespace0.0: processed
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: base: /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0 dev: btt0.
libndctl: to_module: alias: nd:t5 module: nd_pmem
libndctl: parse_lbasize_supported: btt0.0: 512 520 528 4096 4104 4160 4224
libndctl: __sysfs_read_attr: failed to read /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/btt0.0/size: No such device or address
libndctl: __sysfs_device_parse: btt0.0: processed
libndctl: write_attr: failed to write 27283b48-a90f-49b4-ab93-5db7427cd7c8 to /sys/devices/LNXSYSTM:00/LNXSYBUS:00/ACPI0012:00/ndbus0/region0/namespace0.0/uuid: Device or resource busy
setup_namespace:347: namespace0.0: set_uuid failed: Device or resource busy
failed to create namespace: Device or resource busy
Version:
kernel-4.20
ndctl v62
Could you let me know what might be causing the problem?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: