fix: include indirect BVH option #1697
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
|
This pull request is automatically built and testable in CodeSandbox. To see build info of the built libraries, click here or the icon next to each commit SHA. Latest deployment of this branch, based on commit 5d5b64f:
|
|
sorry for the long wait, and thanks! |
|
🎉 This PR is included in version 9.88.15 🎉 The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Why
My use case requires that the triangles of my mesh be in their original order. Garrett's library saw this use case and has created an experimental accomodation for it but that isn't currently carried through to the
<Bvh>component. I know it's marked as experimental but I've been using it for some time now and I've had no issues. I think as long as Drei doesn't obscure it's experimental nature it's fine to include?What
Includes the
indirectoption from three-mesh-bvh. I've copied his explanation of the option into the docs verbatim.Checklist