-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 66
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move operator tests to logic tests #226
Comments
@asubiotto Can you assign this to me? |
Sure! |
@asubiotto Thanks!!! |
hi @bitethecode are you still working on this? if not then i would like to pick this up if that's ok with you |
Hi @palash25, are you still interested in working on this? I can reassign to you given that we haven't heard back. |
Sorry for being late here. I tried to figure it out but it's too complicated to me. You can unassign! |
thanks for assigning i will look into it this weekend |
Also adds support for NotEq and Regexp operators to the sqlparser Issue: polarsignals#226 Signed-off-by: Palash Nigam <npalash25@gmail.com>
as i have already submitted 2 PRs, i would like to be unassigned so that someone else can try to convert the remaining go tests |
Also adds support for NotEq and Regexp operators to the sqlparser Issue: #226 Signed-off-by: Palash Nigam <npalash25@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Palash Nigam <npalash25@gmail.com>
I think there are still some tests to be moved (notably the projection tests in |
This issue is stale because it has been open 30 days with no activity. Remove stale label or comment or this will be closed in 5 days. |
A datadriven logic testing framework was recently added in #211. Slowly but surely, it would be nice to move our operator tests to this logic testing framework to promote readability and conciseness. #255 does this for the distinct operator. This issue can be closed once the following tests have been moved over:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: