Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP: Clean memory sanitizer warnings around GEOS code #265

Closed

Conversation

Algunenano
Copy link
Member

Shut up some of the warnings I get when running unit tests with -fsanitizer=memory

@@ -378,6 +378,8 @@ static char * lwdouble_to_dms(double val, const char *pos_dir_symbol, const char

/* Allocate space for the result. Leave plenty of room for excess digits, negative sign, etc.*/
result = (char*)lwalloc(format_length + WORK_SIZE);
memset(result, 0, format_length + WORK_SIZE);
Copy link
Member

@dbaston dbaston Jul 5, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Do you think we should add a lwcalloc function that delegates to calloc on the lwgeom side and palloc0 on the postgis side?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I've thought about that and it might help, but at the end of of the day if you don't use memset you probably won't use lwcalloc either.

Also, this case looks like a false positive as I don't see any way for the memory outside of the set string to be read, but since it's an output function and memset shouldn't any noticeable impact in performance I've decided to set it and make the sanitizer output clearer.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

grep -R -B1 "memset(" --include "*.c" | grep alloc | wc shows 20 or so usages. Seems worth it to me.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Most of those seem uses to set simple structs, but I wouldn't oppose for it to be added in a followup issue.

@Algunenano
Copy link
Member Author

Trac issue: https://trac.osgeo.org/postgis/ticket/4118

@strk strk closed this in ec51dc1 Jul 6, 2018
@Algunenano Algunenano deleted the sanitizer_memory_geos branch November 15, 2019 15:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
2 participants